Category: Uncategorized

  • Copying Versus Stretching the Rope

    The worst criticism we could level at each others’ creative activities as kids? “You copied!”

    I’ve carried a dread fear of copying through to adulthood, insisting on creating my own characters and worlds, sneering at derivative works like fan-fiction.

    Today I sucked up my pride and copied.

    As I’ve written here, I’ve been poring over the Franco-Belgian comic series Spirou et Fantasio, studying the thick-and-thin weight variations in the sweeping inked lines, marvelling at the composition of the panels and the scenes, completely befuddled by the French dialogue boxes but mentally photocopying the spoken and shouted lettering styles.

    Lately I’ve been frustrated by certain limitations in my drawing. I’m ready for the next level, and anything that falls short of that is glaringly obvious and annoying to me. Specifically, I’m unhappy at things like my rendering of hands and shoes, which are turning out like vague potatoes and yams at the end of characters’ limbs.

    So, finished my copywriting work, I’ve been studying panels of Spirou and looking at hands, feet, clothes, faces.
    image

    Strangely, copying this work is easy, and I think it’s because these shapes have been in my imagination since childhood. I’ve been almost drawing them for decades, so climbing over that last little wall doesn’t take much effort.

    There’s a beautiful weight to these artists’ figures. (“Oh, I can do variable line-weights, just not at the size I usually draw because it takes a brush!”) Even when drawn in the goofiest style, there’s an awareness of how cloth folds, how limbs twist. As I worked on this, I found myself thinking, “I like that kind of eye, I don’t like those noses, those fingers are too detailed:” So I know where I want to go, and it’s not exactly these characters. But I’m learning a lot from them!

    Good drawing, it turns out, is about good planning. While I’ve long enjoyed being able to sit down and quickly draw anything I think of, the figures always stopped short because something about them never quite ‘read’ properly — limbs stuck out or joined at funny angles. I want to be able to draw characters that fit together properly in the mind.

    So after this ‘copying’ exercise, I spent about an hour getting comfortable with applying this principle to my own drawings, and ended up very happy about the results.

    image

    As I walked home from the pub, where I’d spent the whole day working at Table 10, I saw the world broken down into shapes — the slanted rectangles of the lamp-posts, the ovals and circles of the seagulls, and the vanishing-point exercise of the old grey buildings of this town receding off to pointed triangular roof-silhouettes.

    Of course, this is exactly how all those books I read as a kid told me to draw, but it was just too frustrating to follow their instructions, which always felt like this:

    image

    Now I’m at a point where I can do this, though, and it’s time to step up to that level of detail. Not doing it feels like trying to use a tent without poles!

    My dad shared a great image with me during our conversation last weekend about how important it is to always be learning: In the coal-mines where his father worked, they regularly removed the steel cable that lowered men and supplies down to the coal-face. Why? To measure it. “When the rope stops stretching:” they said. The unspoken part? It breaks and something bad happens.

    So here’s to being a stretchy rope.

  • Birthday Card

    Photo 20 Jun 2013 09_43 AM
    Photo 20 Jun 2013 09_41 AM

    It makes absolutely no sense putting this much effort into a birthday card for a three-year-old whose very touch would instantly destroy it.

    I wanted to do something, though, and making a stuffed toy didn’t work out at all: First, I started cutting out the pattern, then realised that there was another pattern on the back. Oh, okay, so I should photocopy it? But the pattern paper was bigger than my printer/scanner’s bed by about four times.

    Right, so I used my lightbox to trace out the pattern, struggling to ignore the lines coming through from the reverse side. Then I cut out the zillion pieces of fabric… and discovered the many of the shapes were half as wide as they should be. The pattern pieces had a little box with arrows that — I guess — means “This shape times two, mirrored”. Or something. The book had absolutely no explanation for how to use the included patterns.

    So I decided to go back to paper. I know paper. A card is pointless, but Craig already bought her a dress.

    I don’t know have a clue how to relate to very young kids. I’m looking forward to my friends’ kids and my niece being older. “Oh good, you’re here, we can talk, I can draw stuff for you, we can make up parameters for games, and you can stay with me? Great, let’s play!”

  • More On Power (Moron Power)

    On Friday we went to see another concert at the Lyth Arts Centre, this time a duo of traditional Scottish musicians, Fiona Hunter and Mike Vass:

    We’d been out a couple of times during the week, including a trip to Thurso to see The Great Gatsby:

    My expectations were very low, because I’d read reviews that wrote the movie off as just an empty spectacle. They certainly had a point, but that judgment is based on begging the question that spectacle is a bad thing. For me, it was like getting to look through a stereoscope picture of 1922 for two-and-a-half hours — which was completely fun. So what if the characters were cardboard cut-outs? They are in the novel, too.

    “¦Or so I’ve been told — I’m among the few who didn’t read the book in high school, and I’ve just never got around to it since, mainly because I had an instinct that it was a certain kind of book. Last week I read a beautifully written review that confirmed my suspicions: “Why I Hate The Great Gatsby“. The critic’s points can be fairly levelled at the movie, too — and yet it was wonderful to see someone have the budget and the vision to deliver such a visual treat. The characters were just an excuse to keep showing and watching, and in this case I was okay with that. It’s the first 3D movie I’ve seen that uses the technology throughout the film to an effect that’s not only good but adds to the overall value of the piece (perhaps even lending it value it wouldn’t otherwise have).

    ~

    I’ve been driving a lot lately. If we have to go somewhere, I drive. I knew from the beginning that this is how you’re supposed to get comfortable and familiar with the process, but driving jangled my nerves so much that I just couldn’t subject myself to it any more than once or twice a week. But a few weeks back Craig and I switched seats, and now it’s consistently fine and even fun. Regardless of what the examiner will have to say about it, I declare myself a driver. It’s just a matter of time until I get my licence, because the difficult part is over.

    My mantra for driving is breathe, notice, enjoy. When I remember those three things, I’m fine.

    Now I just wish the car ran on air or water or something other than carbon-emitting, war-provoking dinosaur juice.

    As we drove back from the concert Friday night, along Wick’s main street, I was surrounded by the boy racers, who swung around the roundabout, heading back to do another circuit of the town and rev their motors.

    I could get it, kind of: This picks up on my point about power in the last post, and a car definitely gives you a feeling of power. But all that gunshot muffler, deafening-growl engine noise”¦ it’s stupid. Thats not really power, and whatever substitute it is, a populated area is not the place to express it.

  • The Dream is Always the Same

    ~

    I read an article this morning which put this idea into my head: As young creative people we want our talents to be witnessed. As mature creative people we want to use our talents to witness.

    That feels right to me.

    But there’s something about power in here, too: I don’t seek power, and I’m turned off by people who do. I just want to be present in the moment and witness life in its infinite variety of forms. Yet how much of my shunning power comes from not getting any? Is this sour grapes, or liberation from the values of a material world that’s disconnected from its source? Or both?

    I doodled this today as a response to a drawing prompt on Twitter from Off-Life magazine:

    It scares me a bit because it’s such a powerful, kinda violent image (reffed* from that classic picture of Muhammed Ali).

    *”Reffing” is a handy word I’ve picked up: referring to source material when drawing.

    In a Strategic Coach meeting yesterday it struck me that I don’t really have any plans. Probing further, asking why, I got an image/feeling like there’s no hot air for my balloon. No hope.

    They say “Hope is for suckers”, but I’m inclined more toward “Hope is for people who aren’t satisfied with the present.” Still, Strategic Coach say “Always make your future bigger than your past”, and that does seem to be the best way to stay engaged and feel some enthusiasm about life.

    I don’t know what I want. I do know that I don’t want to shake things up just for the sake of it; there has to be a point.

    Here’s something I know: It’s been sunny here for about a fortnight, and it’s a real pleasure just having that going on in the background. It tickles my brain.

  • Franco-Belgian Love

    I’m in love”¦ With my husband, of course, but I’ve discovered a series of Franco-Belgian comics called Spirou et Fantasio and I have a huge cartoon-crush on the beautiful line quality in these stories. I want to learn how to draw/ink like this.

    (My French is weak at best, so reading them is a whole other challenge.)

    The books have had several writers and illustrators over the years, so the style varies, as does my liking, but”¦ Wow.

    When I was an actor, I used to admire certain other actors then see myself on camera and think, “Oh, I’m like them.” So there was a harmonic resonance, because they represented a potential I aspired to, or were hitting the standards I set out for myself. Same here: I probably admire this because it’s like the work I do””or how I’d like my work to be.

    And those lines!

    Speaking of lines, it’s such a fine one between inspiration/appreciation and envy/defeat.

    Universe, I would really like the freedom to spend every day just learning new skills and ideas.

  • Friday Geekery

    A little bit of Star Wars geekery to finish the week, since I’ve got my childhood on the brain.

  • Working Toward Peanuts

    I had a dream this morning in which I was back in my primary school library. Oh, the hours I spend there as a kid, poring over the huge hard-bound collections of “Peanuts” comics. I wanted so badly to be able to draw like Charles M. Schultz.

    I wrote to Schultz once, asking for a pencil sketch — because that would have to be an original. I got a nice letter back from an assistant with some copies enclosed. It wasn’t quite what I wanted, but I still cherished it.

    Fast-forward to today, where I can find a piece of work that I like and buy it, and before I’ve even read it I’m already exchanging quips on Twitter with the author. The future is a very cool place to live in some respects, and that breaking down of the wall between creative people and readers is definitely one of them.

    The last few days I’ve been conversing with someone about Gregg Shorthand (sparing my beloved from having to hear remarks like “Sorry, I habitually put hatches through those parentheses because in shorthand they would mean something else if I didn’t”). Looking up some resources, I stumbled across these again — examples of Schultz’s familiarity with Gregg.

    Woodstock was always my favourite character, and I tried over and over to draw him in Schultz’s unique, wiggly hand. Funny to think now of Woodstock acting as Snoopy’s transcriptionist, writing in Gregg:

    In that strip, he wrote what Snoopy said verbatim. Schultz uses a few “officey” brief forms I tend to forget about (abbreviations like J-M for “gentlemen”), but his outlines aren’t very precise: the length of certain letters is too short, so “dog” is really “doc”, and “bad” is “bat”.

    Here’s another:

    Linus opens by saying “Merry Christmas to all, and to all a good night”. (Merry Crms to all nd to all a g nit.)

    Since Schultz writes “all” out in full, I can do a little forensics work and deduce that he probably learned Simplified or a later form (Diamond Jubilee, Centennial, or Series 90). These later variations were easier to learn because they contained fewer abbreviation principles, but as a result require you to spell out more words in full, cutting short the speed gains the earlier forms make possible.

    Linus transcribes:

    Dr Santa: Ow V-U B? (“X” is a question-mark.)

    A-v-b g all eer nd m luking fd to Crmas…

    D u pls brng me a pru[sic] setr nd a jmp rp?

    Th-ing u in advens, I reman u-sinse-ly…

    G cref[sic].

    So there you go. And I continue in my efforts to wrench this skill out of the Fifties and take full advantage of it.

  • Digital Drawing Stinks

    I got the new replacement tips for my stylus today, so I figured I’d have another go at digital drawing.

    I hate it.

    There’s a great thick-thin some people can produce (see my previous post on this), and lots of examples of masterful painting techniques that are possible on digital devices, but I just can’t do it. It feels like trying to draw with a vibrating tube of lipstick.

    So here’s an example: I decided to draw a dog to demonstrate. Here it is sketched out in non-photo blue pencil (which shows up in pictures and scans, but I’ve still taken to it as a way to pre-visualise shapes).

    Then I inked it in with a fine Platinum Carbon Desk Pen filled with waterproof Carbon ink (loving both of these).

    Oops: I used regular writing paper, so the results from here on out are bleedy — not the ideal to show the power of paper, but I can’t be arsed drawing it all over again. And when I draw something the first time, I often capture a certain spirit or feeling about it that I can’t simply reproduce. So this is this dog; another would be another dog.

    I then went over the outside lines with my regular pen (a Kaweco with its nib swapped out for a Tombow Extra-Fine nib, also filled with Carbon ink).

    Now, the real pros will ink with a dip-pen fitted with a G nib. I used to draw my “good” drawings with a dip pen when I was little, but the ink running out meant I could never get a consistent line. Still, the G is a very flexible nib which allows for that thick and thin variation that I try to fake by going over the outside line with a thicker nib. It’s not ideal and sometimes messy, so I’m working on that.

    Then I erase the pencil (or not, if it’s in my sketchbook). I didn’t wait long enough, so the dog got a bit smudged. (Again, bad paper, combined with impatience, as I was just doing this for an exercise.)

    Finally, I paint it with water-brushes. With this cheap cartridge paper, that’s where it all really goes to hell.

    Still, as mushy and uneven as this is, trying to do this on the tablet was worse.

    I blued in a rough on one layer…

    …Then went over the lines on another layer. To get that line variation, I have to vary the pressure and speed of the stroke, which makes the lines haphazard. Even going slowly, though, the lines have a wibbly wiggliness to them. What I intend is not what shows up.

    Then the “watercolour” paint:

    Ugh! It’s baby poo.

    Yesterday I drew this fella, who I imagined was the Ambassador for the Free State of the Subconscious. This is exactly what I had in mind, and that’s exactly who showed up through my hand:

    So, yeah, I’m giving up on digital drawing — yet again. Perhaps I could buy a Wacom Cintiq for £2,000 and sit connected to a desktop, but I’d rather stick to my pens and paper for now.

    Technology should serve us, not the other way around.

  • Death of the High Street

    Aww, D.R. Simpson is closing. The newsagent/bookshop was one of the last hold-outs in Wick, but apparently the costs and the competition from chains stores on the outskirts of town have finally done them in.

    Funny that the shop-owners we spoke to in Stromness responded with pity when we said we were visiting from Wick. Stromness is hardly a big place, but it and Kirkwall (the two main towns on the Orkney Islands) have a self-generated spirit and culture about them that Wick, well, doesn’t.